Peter Christ

Is his REAL name.
Honestly.
Now button yer lip and listen to what he has to say.

Easily the most concise and articulate presentation (I’ve ever seen) of the case against the War On Drugs. Like all other attempts, it will not penetrate the dense wall of fear and ignorance which cushions the authoritarian from reality. But it might reduce the numbers recruited to their cause…

Advertisements

Hang The Jury

let’s hope this attack on the War on Drugs has more success than my own feeble efforts, which included my attempt to promote the same tactic back in 1999.

The novel angle here is the focus – inspired, apparently, by Michelle Alexander’s “New Jim Crow” – on the Black American community, whose males are, on average, over 600% more likely to end up in prison than their white compatriots. The vast majority of the difference is made up for by imprisonment for the victimless political “crime” of drug possession which, incidentally, they are “guilty” of at about the same rate as their white male counterparts. Who said Justice was colour-blind?

I have long wondered why this overt judicial racism hasn’t already led to a massive insurgency from within the black community. Even today the causes of the next American civil war look far more likely to emerge from the lunatic right-wing Tea Party than the genuinely oppressed black community. But perhaps web sites like this show that, at last, the worm may be beginning to turn…

When did they make Public Sexual Molestation and Humiliation Legal?

This story OUGHT to provoke a wave of revulsion on a par with the reaction to the senseless slaying at Sandy Hook. Will it? Don’t hold your breath…

Full credit to the Daily Mail. I kick them often enough, but, as far as I could tell, at the time I came across this story, they were the only mainstream news source anywhere in the world to have published it.

Ironically (given it was their own dash cam which has implicated them) it illustrates the increasingly urgent need for Trusted Surveillance to record the criminal activities (or, I should say, “activities which, in a civilised country, ought to be criminal”) routinely committed by the Forces of Internal Repression

Remember:
Citizen – Innocent Until Proved Guilty.
Authority – Guilty Until Proved Innocent.

MAJOR breakthrough on Cannabis and Jury Nullification

New Hampshire may have cracked open the Dam. But will their trickle turn into a flood?

What they have done is truly radical, and – if the Federal Government does not move rapidly to stamp on it – even potentially revolutionary; causing much more significant change to society than, for example, the liberating effects of the 60s.

You’ll excuse me if I allow myself a high-five or two, given my own first foray into this field back in 1999. I was then promoting a subversive adoption of Jury Nullification designed to get around the obstacle of the Judiciary to any mention of the N word.

What the Libertarians have pulled off in New Hampshire is much more ambitious than that. They’ve managed to pass a State Law explicitly stating:

The Jury in a criminal trial case has the undisputed power to acquit, even if its verdict is contrary to the law as given by the judge and contrary to the evidence. This power of jury nullification is a historical prerogative of the jury inherent in the use of the general verdict in criminal cases.

I genuinely cannot exaggerate the importance of this breakthrough. It may one day be regarded as the day we began the march to true democracy. They’ve “only” delivered the “Second Change“! And if you read that piece you’ll get a feel for the scale of their achievement. The Judicial system has been fighting against this development for over a hundred years.

They actually enacted the new law a few months ago so why didn’t we hear about it before now? Well as you can learn from the “Reason” link above, the law isn’t officially “live” till the first day of 2013. Obviously the Courts in that part of the world are keen to adopt the new rules, which bodes well for their success.

I’m sure you’ll agree that’s worth a spliff…

Nutt demolishes latest Cannabis Lung Scare Story

Thank-you Professor Nutt. You’ve saved me the wasted time and effort of writing to the British Lung Foundation myself. I first read their latest drivel last week in the Mail. I knew it was complete bollocks; had any REAL research found such a clear conclusion it would have been headline news around the world for weeks. The authoritarians would have ensured it was fully trumpeted, around the clock, from all available rooftops.

So once the steam had cleared and I had stopped kicking the cat, I resolved to write to the BLF and ask, as politely as I could muster, where we could read this startling new evidence for ourselves. David Nutt has far more clout than I do and they’ve pointedly ignored him, so I’d have had no chance. But this is his day job. So he’s done a brilliant job here dissecting and revealing the true extent of their peculiar and obsessive duplicity.

Peculiar because I don’t understand their motives. They’re a charity f-fuxake, so they can’t have a financial interest. They have no obvious axe to grind. The Lung Cancer wards are not being clogged with cannabis smokers. Indeed their own evidence, should they ever bother analysing it will almost certainly reveal that cannabis smokers are under-represented in the statistics.

So why do they try so hard – and so consistently – to promote that ignorant and illicit authoritarian line? Could it be the price they pay for support from some of their donors? I’ve just checked their most recent audited accounts and if one or more of their donors is leaning on them, it’s certainly not obvious which one of them would give a damn. Feel free to speculate…

Yet Another Former Drug Warrior Attacks Prohibition

Fascinating to see increasing numbers of former high-placed employees of the various Prohibitionist Police States (like this one in the Guardian) declaring their Damascene conversions against Prohibition. Note first that they nearly always are FORMER employees. The few current employees who dare to challenge the naked emperor usually find their careers taking a nose dive (remember Brian Paddick ferinstance…), so incumbents are usually happy to take the Kings Shilling and continue to assist the oppressive regime.

There is also an emerging pattern in the utterances of the converted. They all point out – uncontroversially – that prohibition is the single major cause of organised crime around the world. We’ve known that since the ludicrous American experiment with alcohol prohibition and its creation of “The Mob” – together with its “necessary” antithesis, the FBI.

None, though, have made the obvious connection. The Powers That Be, having recognised the effect of prohibition on organised crime, also recognised how much power it “legitimised” for themselves (Power necessary in order to tackle the Problem they created in the first place). Hence today we can see that the main POINT of prohibition is precisely to sustain that organised crime around the world.

It provides the political cover for the excessive spending on authoritarian crime control measures, including the surveillance they need to monitor their increasingly well-informed and potentially rebellious populations. It provides the infrastructure necessary for the Prison State which is at its most advanced state in the “Land Of The Free” and it provides a handy slush fund for all the Black Ops that most governments occasionally find useful.

These connections are obvious to anyone who dares to see beyond the flabby nakedness of the Empire. That doesn’t yet include mainstream politicians or media, just us “mavericks”. If you’ve read this far, you’re probably also one of us. Glad to meet you…

PRAISE GOD & PASS THE WEED

jeezus h christ! Colour me ‘king astonished.

Obviously I’m not going to disagree with a word of this article by The Libertarian Lady

but I was amazed to learn from her about Pat Robertson’s “coming out” for legalisation. I’d have thought that would have made mainstream headlines, even this side of the pond. Nada. First I’ve heard about it and that a month after the event. Thank’s Kristin.

It is genuinely significant. Most of the other famous/infamous conservatives who have favoured legalisation are on the libertarian side of the Republican movement. Robertson definitely ain’t one of them. And that suggests a possibility that we may be in sight of a tipping point. Mind you, we’ve been there before (Jimmy Carter) and someone frightened the horses, so don’t hold your breath…