The Real Matrix-6

OK, this is a side issue on my Waterloo Conspiracy trail but I need to deal with it some time so this is a marker at least for my own benefit. The Author claims a PhD. Without wishing to appear to be making an ad hominem attack, I find that surprising – unless it actually constitutes evidence of one of his main charges; viz the deliberate dumbing down of the American Education system.

Getting a PhD is – or used to be at any rate – ‘king hard work and among the skills you require are the ability to perform serious research. I got my first inkling that all was not well in this context when I read the first few parts of this piece. He’s quoting one of my favourite and most trusted sources; Carroll Quigley. But it was obvious that he was quoting him very selectively. I’ll back that up some other time.

It was when I got to this part that the wheels came off. The railing against the Sexual Liberation revolution which began with the Kinsey Report and reached a peak in the late sixties is straight out of the Xtian right. And his glib assertion regarding Kinsey’s data on the sexuality of children:

"which we now know involved the criminal sexual torture of children and even infants by Kinsey’s group of homosexuals and pedophiles"

is one of the sickest distortions still in the wild. It is virtually entirely based on the work of one Judith Reisman who is clearly a very sick puppy herself. She characterises one of the greatest love scenes in English Literature – from Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet – as child pornography. You will find a fairly reasonable demolition of her work summarised in this blog. Which saves me the trouble of having to do it myself…

I’ll list several major contradictions later as well, but here’s one to be going on with: It is alleged that the sexualisation of America is all part of the distraction game the "super-elite" are playing to prevent Americans questioning what’s really going on in their world. Anothe allegation is that the demopublicans are hand picked, by the super-elite for their willingness and tendency to toe the line and give the illusion of choice. Yet it was these hand picked demopublicans who paid for Reisman’s research which was so clearly aimed at halting the sexualisation which is supposed to be helping with the distraction.

The irritating thing is, I fully agree with Yates about the demopublican game and the illusion of choice. But you can’t have it both ways. It would be a VERY unintelligent "super-elite" that mismanaged its affairs to that extent. In fact, one would have to say it would not be much of an "elite" at all. Just a bunch of Authoritarians with their hands on the tiller and never quite sure which way to steer.

And that, coincidentally, is much closer to the picture painted by Quigley. The whole point of "The Anglo American Establishment" is that while it is perfectly true that they set up the Round Tables, Chatham House and the Council of Foreign Relations, and influenced the foreign policy of the Empire, to a greater or lesser extent for the best part of 70 years, in nearly every major task they set themselves, they blew it big time.

About Harry Stottle
Refugee from the Stumbleupon Blogicide of October 2011 Here you will find my "kneejerk" responses to the world and what I happen to bump into. For my more detailed considerations and proposals, please visit my website or my previous main blogging site.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: